SOP Title: Handling of Deviations
OBJECTIVE
To define the procedure for handling deviations that may occur during dispensing, manufacturing, testing, or storage. This also includes issues related to equipment or facility maintenance and engineering.
SCOPE
This procedure applies to reporting, investigating, reviewing, and following up on deviations involving materials, testing procedures, products, equipment/facility maintenance, or processes. It includes all departments, product categories (Product/General), and any market or customer complaints.
RESPONSIBILITY
Originating / Initiating Department
Quality Assurance
Other Departments (QC, Microbiology, Production, Engineering, Warehouse, HR, EHS/Safety, IT, R&D, etc.)
DEFINITIONS
Deviation
A deviation means any unexpected change or departure from approved procedures, instructions, standards, policies, or current status within the company.
Critical Deviation
A critical deviation poses a serious risk to patient safety. It may affect product quality and can lead to the release of harmful products. Examples include data falsification, fraud, or a major system failure that could harm patients. These deviations affect critical processes or equipment and may involve life-threatening situations.
Major Deviation
A major deviation is serious but does not pose an immediate risk to the patient. It may affect the product’s quality, safety, or regulatory compliance, but it is not life-threatening. These may involve unplanned events that could potentially cause non-compliance or specification issues.
Minor Deviation
A minor deviation is a small issue that does not fall under critical or major. It shows a departure from Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) but does not affect product quality, safety, or labeling. These can involve equipment, materials, environment, or documentation.
PROCEDURE
Deviation Procedure
The following are examples (but not limited to) of situations that may require logging a deviation:
Other situations that can trigger a deviation:
If a market complaint, OOS (Out of Specification), OOC (Out of Calibration), or OOT (Out of Trend) investigation finds the cause to be a procedural deviation, a separate deviation form is not needed. Instead, the deviation details will be included in the investigation report using the investigation tools defined in this SOP.
Reporting a Deviation
Deviation Form Handling
Deviation Number Format
Format: PADYYXZZZ
Separate Logbooks
QA Responsibilities
Deviation Investigation
Investigation Process
Investigation Report Should Include:
Final Steps
Closing Deviations
After the investigation, the initial classification (Minor/Major/Critical) can be updated based on the final risk assessment. This must be noted by the QA Head or designee in the remarks section.
The deviation report must be signed by the deviation owner and approved by the Site QA Head or their designee.
If similar deviations have occurred in the past (within at least one year), they should be reviewed to check the effectiveness of previously implemented CAPAs. These should be documented in Annexure.
If a deviation is reclassified as Critical, QA must inform the customer within 5 working days through appropriate communication channels.
Once the investigation is complete, the deviation owner submits the investigation report and completed risk assessment form to QA for final review and approval.
All deviations should be closed within 30 working days from the date of logging.
If more time is needed to close a deviation:
All supporting documents—like investigation reports, assessments, and communications—must be attached to the deviation form and clearly cross-referenced.
The quality head and department heads must review deviations and CAPAs during regular management reviews, as per SOP
Deviation Trending
Deviation trends must be analysed twice a year, and reports should be prepared by:
Trending is carried out by QA and results are shared with management during reviews.
Trending reports (using Annexure) may be adjusted as needed and must include repeated or similar deviations.
Trends should consider deviation types and areas, such as:
Trend Analysis Document Number Format:
QA/DEV/MMM/YY/ZZ
Investigation Tools
Start by identifying the most likely cause of the deviation. If the cause is unclear, use tools listed in Section 5.2.2, including those below.
6M Ishikawa (Fishbone) Diagram
Used to explore causes from six areas:
Why-Why Analysis
Reinvestigation of Deviation
If a deviation report is found to be incomplete or deficient during an internal or external audit, an addendum must be prepared in consultation with the QA Head or Site Quality Head.
If a deviation needs to be reopened, the reason must be documented in the deviation form (Annexure).
QA must issue a Deviation Reopen Request Form, which should be attached to the original deviation report.
To reopen a deviation, the same deviation number will be used. The user department, QA, and cross-functional team will continue the investigation using the original record.
REFERENCES
ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation | Full Form |
APQR | Annual Product Quality Review |
CAPA | Corrective and Preventive Action |
CFR | Code of Federal Regulations |
CSV | Computer System Validation |
CPP | Critical Process Parameter |
FMEA | Failure Mode and Effect Analysis |
FMECA | Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis |
FTA | Fault Tree Analysis |
GMP | Good Manufacturing Practices |
VMP | Validation Master Plan |
OOS | Out of Specification |
OOC | Out of Calibration |
OOT | Out of Trend |
Copyright © 2025 Pharma Blogger.